[glm-grade=B] fix(monitoring): restore dead-detection for verified loopback upstreams (DC-054)
DC-053 follow-ups (queue item 2b). Three small fixes to the caddy-upstream-watcher: 1. verifiedViaBridge flag: a loopback upstream whose PRIOR probe succeeded via host-gateway proves the bridge CAN reach the host. A later failed probe is then near-conclusive evidence the upstream itself went dead. The DC-053 code unconditionally marked loopback failures as unverifiable, throwing away this signal. Now: track verifiedViaBridge per-upstream and treat verified-then-failed as down (count failures, open incident after DEAD_AFTER_MS=5min). 2. IN_CONTAINER=false kill-switch test (B-grade polish, folded into same commit per conjoint-commit anti-pattern). 3. git.sami intermittent ENOTFOUND (~2/h in ssl-monitor TLS handshake): pin git.sami -> 100.121.150.22 (DNS2 Tailscale) in container /etc/hosts via --add-host in start.sh. Existing comment explicitly forbids pinning to DNS3/100.81.59.99 (no HTTPS listener there); DNS2/100.121.150.22 is correct (Caddy serves git.sami on DNS2:443 and routes to DNS3:3030 internally). GLM-5.3 judge round 1 (208s, 6 tool calls, on-disk verified): grade B, all 25 tests green, no blocking issues, 3 LOW polish suggestions. Folded two actionable LOWs (persistence + JSDoc) into this commit: - verifiedViaBridge now persisted in _saveState/_restoreUpstreamStates so a known-good loopback upstream stays labeled across container restarts (1-tick blip becomes 0-tick). - snapshot() gained JSDoc describing the verifiedViaBridge semantic for dashboard consumers. Third LOW (long-term: prefer host-side liveness signal from Caddy) is a roadmap note, not actionable now. Tests: 1921/1921 (was 1910; +11 net: 6 new for items 2b-a/2b-b/persistence + 5 previously-skipped baseline). Full suite 86/86 green.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -472,4 +472,142 @@ describe('CaddyUpstreamWatcher', () => {
|
||||
const order = w.snapshot().upstreams.map(u => u.host);
|
||||
expect(order).toEqual(['2.2.2.2:80', 'localhost:9876', '1.1.1.1:80']);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// ---- verifiedViaBridge (DC-053 follow-up item 2b-a) ----------------------
|
||||
// A loopback upstream whose PRIOR probe succeeded via host-gateway proves
|
||||
// the bridge CAN reach the host. If a later probe then fails, that is
|
||||
// near-conclusive evidence the upstream itself went dead — not that
|
||||
// bridge connectivity broke. Restore dead-detection for that subset.
|
||||
|
||||
test('successful host-gateway probe sets verifiedViaBridge=true on loopback upstream', async () => {
|
||||
seedSites({ 'zap.sami': 'zap.sami { reverse_proxy localhost:8088 }\n' });
|
||||
probeQueue.push({ kind: 'ok', statusCode: 200 });
|
||||
const { w } = loadWatcher();
|
||||
await w.scanSites();
|
||||
const u = w.upstreams.get('localhost:8088');
|
||||
expect(u.verifiedViaBridge).toBeFalsy();
|
||||
await w._probeOne(u);
|
||||
expect(u.verifiedViaBridge).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(u.status).toBe('up');
|
||||
expect(w.snapshot().upstreams[0].verifiedViaBridge).toBe(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('loopback upstream with verifiedViaBridge fails -> counts as down (not unverifiable)', async () => {
|
||||
seedSites({ 'zap.sami': 'zap.sami { reverse_proxy localhost:8088 }\n' });
|
||||
// First probe succeeds (sets verifiedViaBridge), second probe fails.
|
||||
probeQueue.push({ kind: 'ok', statusCode: 200 });
|
||||
probeQueue.push({ kind: 'err', message: 'connect ECONNREFUSED 172.17.0.1:8088' });
|
||||
const { w } = loadWatcher();
|
||||
const fakeHealthChecker = { createIncident: jest.fn(), resolveIncident: jest.fn(), incidents: [] };
|
||||
w.healthChecker = fakeHealthChecker;
|
||||
await w.scanSites();
|
||||
const u = w.upstreams.get('localhost:8088');
|
||||
await w._probeOne(u);
|
||||
expect(u.verifiedViaBridge).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(u.status).toBe('up');
|
||||
await w._probeOne(u);
|
||||
expect(u.status).toBe('down');
|
||||
expect(u.consecutiveFailures).toBe(1);
|
||||
expect(u.lastError).toMatch(/ECONNREFUSED/);
|
||||
// Snapshot also reflects verifiedViaBridge so dashboard can label it.
|
||||
const snap = w.snapshot().upstreams[0];
|
||||
expect(snap.verifiedViaBridge).toBe(true);
|
||||
// No incident yet — needs DEAD_AFTER_MS of continuous failure.
|
||||
expect(fakeHealthChecker.createIncident).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('loopback upstream with verifiedViaBridge eventually opens a dead incident', async () => {
|
||||
seedSites({ 'zap.sami': 'zap.sami { reverse_proxy localhost:8088 }\n' });
|
||||
probeQueue.push({ kind: 'ok', statusCode: 200 }); // probe 1: success -> verifiedViaBridge
|
||||
probeQueue.push({ kind: 'err', message: 'down' });
|
||||
const { w } = loadWatcher();
|
||||
const fakeHealthChecker = { createIncident: jest.fn(), resolveIncident: jest.fn(), incidents: [] };
|
||||
w.healthChecker = fakeHealthChecker;
|
||||
await w.scanSites();
|
||||
const u = w.upstreams.get('localhost:8088');
|
||||
await w._probeOne(u);
|
||||
// Pre-set lastSuccessAt to DEAD_AFTER_MS ago so the second failure
|
||||
// immediately crosses the 5-minute threshold.
|
||||
u.lastSuccessAt = new Date(Date.now() - 6 * 60 * 1000).toISOString();
|
||||
await w._probeOne(u);
|
||||
expect(fakeHealthChecker.createIncident).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
'localhost:8088',
|
||||
'caddy-upstream-dead',
|
||||
expect.stringMatching(/unreachable for 6m/),
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({ status: 'down', serviceId: 'localhost:8088' })
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// ---- IN_CONTAINER=false kill-switch (DC-053 follow-up item 2b-b) --------
|
||||
// When the API runs bare-metal (or in a sidecar next to Caddy), the
|
||||
// loopback host IS the host — no bridge. Probing loopback verbatim
|
||||
// gives real, conclusive evidence.
|
||||
|
||||
test('IN_CONTAINER=false disables host-gateway remap (probes loopback verbatim)', async () => {
|
||||
process.env.IN_CONTAINER = 'false';
|
||||
try {
|
||||
seedSites({
|
||||
'a.sami': 'a.sami { reverse_proxy localhost:8088 }\n',
|
||||
'b.sami': 'b.sami { reverse_proxy 127.0.0.1:9000 }\n',
|
||||
'c.sami': 'c.sami { reverse_proxy 1.2.3.4:80 }\n' // non-loopback, should still go literal
|
||||
});
|
||||
probeQueue.push({ kind: 'ok', statusCode: 200 });
|
||||
probeQueue.push({ kind: 'ok', statusCode: 200 });
|
||||
probeQueue.push({ kind: 'ok', statusCode: 200 });
|
||||
// Force module reload so the new IN_CONTAINER is picked up at require time.
|
||||
jest.resetModules();
|
||||
const { w } = loadWatcher();
|
||||
await w.scanSites();
|
||||
const http = require('http');
|
||||
for (const u of w.upstreams.values()) await w._probeOne(u);
|
||||
const hostnames = http.request.mock.calls.map(c => c[0].hostname);
|
||||
// All three go to their literal addresses — no host.docker.internal.
|
||||
expect(hostnames).toEqual(['localhost', '127.0.0.1', '1.2.3.4']);
|
||||
// And no upstream is marked verifiedViaBridge (the loopback-success
|
||||
// gate only matters in the bridge case).
|
||||
for (const u of w.upstreams.values()) {
|
||||
expect(u.verifiedViaBridge).toBeFalsy();
|
||||
}
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
delete process.env.IN_CONTAINER;
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('IN_CONTAINER unset (default) still uses host-gateway remap', async () => {
|
||||
delete process.env.IN_CONTAINER;
|
||||
seedSites({ 'zap.sami': 'zap.sami { reverse_proxy localhost:8088 }\n' });
|
||||
probeQueue.push({ kind: 'ok', statusCode: 200 });
|
||||
jest.resetModules();
|
||||
const { w } = loadWatcher();
|
||||
await w.scanSites();
|
||||
const http = require('http');
|
||||
await w._probeOne(w.upstreams.get('localhost:8088'));
|
||||
const call = http.request.mock.calls.find(c => c[0].hostname === 'host.docker.internal');
|
||||
expect(call).toBeTruthy();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// ---- verifiedViaBridge persistence (B-grade polish) -----------------------
|
||||
// GLM judge LOW: don't re-prove bridge connectivity across container
|
||||
// restarts. A previously-positive observation is still good evidence.
|
||||
|
||||
test('verifiedViaBridge survives a save -> reload cycle (state.json round-trip)', async () => {
|
||||
seedSites({ 'zap.sami': 'zap.sami { reverse_proxy localhost:8088 }\n' });
|
||||
probeQueue.push({ kind: 'ok', statusCode: 200 }); // probe succeeds -> verifiedViaBridge=true
|
||||
const { w: w1 } = loadWatcher();
|
||||
await w1.scanSites();
|
||||
const u = w1.upstreams.get('localhost:8088');
|
||||
await w1._probeOne(u);
|
||||
expect(u.verifiedViaBridge).toBe(true);
|
||||
// Force a save.
|
||||
w1._saveState();
|
||||
// Reload from the same file via a fresh watcher instance.
|
||||
jest.resetModules();
|
||||
const { w: w2 } = loadWatcher();
|
||||
await w2.scanSites();
|
||||
const restored = w2.upstreams.get('localhost:8088');
|
||||
expect(restored).toBeTruthy();
|
||||
expect(restored.verifiedViaBridge).toBe(true);
|
||||
// The snapshot field carries it through too.
|
||||
expect(w2.snapshot().upstreams[0].verifiedViaBridge).toBe(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user